android.gs
Compare
Galaxy S23 FE vs Armor 22

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE vs UleFone Armor 22

What Galaxy S23 FE does better (19) and where Armor 22 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy S23 FE

8.3Score

19 advantages≈ $220

Higher score

UleFone · 2023Armor 22

7.7Score

6 advantages≈ $210

7.7Display6.7

9.2Camera5.4

3.0Battery8.2

9.5Features7.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy S23 FEArmor 22

	Galaxy S23 FE	Armor 22	Difference
Height	158 mm	176.8 mm	−18.8 mm
Width	76.5 mm	84.9 mm	−8.4 mm
Thickness	8.2 mm	15 mm	−6.8 mm
Weight	209 g	324 g	−115 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy S23 FE better than Armor 22?

OLED panelYes · Armor 22: No
Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 22: No
Telephoto cameraYes · Armor 22: No
Wireless chargingYes · Armor 22: No
Stereo speakersYes · Armor 22: No
Weight209 g vs 324 g+55%
CPU frequency3 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+46%
Process4 nm vs 12 nm3×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 22: No
Max video8K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Armor 22: No
eSIMYes · Armor 22: No

Why is Armor 22 better than Galaxy S23 FE?

Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+47%
Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy S23 FE: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy S23 FE: Yes
Screen size6.4″ vs 6.6″+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE≈ $2208.3	UleFone Armor 22≈ $2107.7
Design
Weight	209 g	324 g
Thickness	8.2 mm	15 mm
Height	158 mm	176.8 mm
Width	76.5 mm	84.9 mm
Frame	Aluminium	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	—
Colours	Mint, Cream, Graphite, Purple, Indigo, Tangerine	Black, Black/Green
Display
Screen size	6.4″	6.6″
Panel	Dynamic AMOLED 2X	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,408 px
Pixel density	403 ppi	401 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,450 nits	—
Measured brightness	985 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	83.2%	69.5%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 2200 - International	Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96
Chip maker	Qualcomm	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	3 GHz	2.05 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 920 - International Adreno 730 - USA	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	940,921	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,550	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	—
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.9
Main sensor size	1/1.57"	1/1.7"
Rear cameras	3	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	Yes	No
Optical zoom	3×	—
Max video	8K	1080p
4K video frame rate	60 fps	—
Selfie camera	10 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	4,500 mAh	6,600 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	8.5 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	50%	—
Wireless charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging power	15 W	—
Reverse wireless charging	Yes	—
Connectivity
5G	Yes	—
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6E	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 3.2	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	3.2	2
Video output	Yes	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-23.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyro, barometer
SAR (head)	0.76 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 13	Android 13
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—
EU label
Energy class	—	A
Battery charge cycles	—	1,000
Endurance per cycle	—	73 h
Repairability class	—	C
Drop resistance class	—	A