- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S10e vs Xperia XZ3
Samsung Galaxy S10e vs Sony Xperia XZ3
What Galaxy S10e does better (12) and where Xperia XZ3 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.1Display6.8
7.5Camera5.2
2.9Battery3.1
7.4Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S10eXperia XZ3
| Galaxy S10e | Xperia XZ3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 142.2 mm | 158 mm | −15.8 mm |
| Width | 69.9 mm | 73 mm | −3.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9.9 mm | −2 mm |
| Weight | 150 g | 193 g | −43 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S10e better than Xperia XZ3?
- RAM8 GB vs 4 GB2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 64 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Xperia XZ3: No
- Peak brightness940 nits vs 550 nits+71%
- Weight150 g vs 193 g+29%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- 4K video frame rate60 fps vs 30 fps2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Xperia XZ3: No
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 9.9 mm+25%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Screen-to-body ratio83.3% vs 80.5%+3%
Why is Xperia XZ3 better than Galaxy S10e?
- Battery capacity3,100 mAh vs 3,330 mAh+7%
- Main camera16 MP vs 19 MP+19%
- Pixel density438 ppi vs 537 ppi+23%
- CPU frequency2.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+4%
- Screen size5.8″ vs 6″+3%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,440 px+33%
- Selfie camera10 MP vs 13 MP+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 150 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 9.9 mm |
| Height | 142.2 mm | 158 mm |
| Width | 69.9 mm | 73 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Green, Yellow | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 5.8″ | 6″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | POLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,440 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,280 px | 2,880 px |
| Pixel density | 438 ppi | 537 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Peak brightness | 940 nits | 550 nits |
| Measured brightness | 706 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3% | 80.5% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 9820 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 |
| Chip maker | Samsung | Qualcomm |
| Process | 8 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.7 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali G76 MP12 | Adreno 630 |
| AnTuTu score | 724,233 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,629 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 950 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 16 MP | 19 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.5 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.55" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 10 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 3,100 mAh | 3,330 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 40% | — |
| Wireless charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | 15 W | — |
| Reverse wireless charging | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Rear |
| Barometer | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, fingerprint | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, light, compass, barometer, color spectrum, fingerprint |
| SAR (head) | 0.58 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI | — |
