- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy S10 Lite vs Axon 20 4G
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite vs ZTE Axon 20 4G
What Galaxy S10 Lite does better (9) and where Axon 20 4G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.3Display7.1
8.6Camera7.3
5.0Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy S10 LiteAxon 20 4G
| Galaxy S10 Lite | Axon 20 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.5 mm | 172.1 mm | −9.6 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 77.9 mm | −2.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 198 g | −12 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy S10 Lite better than Axon 20 4G?
- Storage (max)512 GB vs 128 GB4×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Axon 20 4G: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 4,220 mAh+7%
- CPU frequency2.84 GHz vs 2 GHz+42%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight186 g vs 198 g+6%
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Screen-to-body ratio87.8% vs 84.8%+4%
Why is Axon 20 4G better than Galaxy S10 Lite?
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
- USB version2 vs 3.1+55%
- Main camera aperturef/2 vs f/1.8+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 198 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 162.5 mm | 172.1 mm |
| Width | 75.6 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ | — |
| Colours | Prism White, Prism Black, Prism Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 705 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.8% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | Unisoc UMS512T / Tiger T618 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.84 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Mali G52 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 370,751 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,151 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 876 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 60 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,220 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 50% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.2 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.49 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
