- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M55 vs T3 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M55 vs Vivo T3 Pro
What Galaxy M55 does better (7) and where T3 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display8.7
6.3Performance6.7
8.5Camera8.6
6.8Battery8.5
8.7Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M55T3 Pro
| Galaxy M55 | T3 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.7 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 184 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M55 better than T3 Pro?
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- NFCYes · T3 Pro: No
- Selfie camera50 MP vs 16 MP3.1×
- Memory card slotYes · T3 Pro: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · T3 Pro: No
- Weight180 g vs 184 g+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is T3 Pro better than Galaxy M55?
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 4,500 nits4.5×
- Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
- AnTuTu score811,120 vs 1,014,174+25%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+10%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,785 vs 3,095+11%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.63 GHz+10%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 90.3%+5%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+4%
- Bluetooth5.2 vs 5.4+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 184 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott Xensation |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Green | Sandstone Orange, Emerald Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED+ | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.63 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 720 |
| AnTuTu score | 811,120 | 1,014,174 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,785 | 3,095 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.96 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
