- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M53 vs Bison GT2 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M53 vs Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro
What Galaxy M53 does better (14) and where Bison GT2 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Display5.3
7.6Camera7.1
5.3Battery7.3
7.1Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M53Bison GT2 Pro
| Galaxy M53 | Bison GT2 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.7 mm | 172.2 mm | −7.5 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 83.9 mm | −6.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 12.9 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Weight | 176 g | 280 g | −104 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M53 better than Bison GT2 Pro?
- Main camera108 MP vs 64 MP+69%
- OLED panelYes · Bison GT2 Pro: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Weight176 g vs 280 g+59%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Bison GT2 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 12.9 mm+74%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 24 MP+33%
Why is Bison GT2 Pro better than Galaxy M53?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M53: Yes
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 405 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 176 g | 280 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 12.9 mm |
| Height | 164.7 mm | 172.2 mm |
| Width | 77 mm | 83.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Green, Blue, Brown | Hack Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 405 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 802 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3% | 70.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 | Mediatek Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | 680,628 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,449 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 609 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.67" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 24 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 44% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -29.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| SAR (head) | 0.6 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5.1 | — |
