- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 vs X90 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M52 vs Vivo X90 Pro
What Galaxy M52 does better (5) and where X90 Pro wins (17) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.8
7.5Camera9.1
5.3Battery8.0
7.9Features9.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52X90 Pro
| Galaxy M52 | X90 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.1 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.5 mm | +1.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.3 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 215 g | −42 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 better than X90 Pro?
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+27%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,870 mAh+3%
- Weight173 g vs 215 g+24%
- Memory card slotYes · X90 Pro: No
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 9.3 mm+26%
Why is X90 Pro better than Galaxy M52?
- Wired charging25 W vs 120 W4.8×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.05 GHz+27%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Max video4K vs 8K
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- eSIMNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 215 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 9.3 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.1 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 74.5 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Eco leather |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | White, Black, Light Blue | Legendary Black, Red |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 934 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 90.8% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.05 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 1,228,735 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 4,273 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 3,565 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 8K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,870 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 120 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 188% |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 50 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Video output | — | Yes |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 3.1 | Funtouch 14 (Global) |
