- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M52 vs X70 Pro
Samsung Galaxy M52 vs Vivo X70 Pro
What Galaxy M52 does better (6) and where X70 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.8
7.5Camera9.6
5.3Battery4.2
7.9Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M52X70 Pro
| Galaxy M52 | X70 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 158.3 mm | +5.9 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 73.2 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Weight | 173 g | 186 g | −13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M52 better than X70 Pro?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,450 mAh+12%
- Main camera64 MP vs 50 MP+28%
- Memory card slotYes · X70 Pro: No
- Weight173 g vs 186 g+8%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Thickness7.4 mm vs 8 mm+8%
Why is X70 Pro better than Galaxy M52?
- RAM8 GB vs 16 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 512 GB4×
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Optical stabilisationNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy M52: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz+25%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Rear cameras3 vs 4+33%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 90.3%+5%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 173 g | 186 g |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 158.3 mm |
| Width | 76.4 mm | 73.2 mm |
| Frame | — | Aluminium |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Schott Xensation Up |
| Colours | White, Black, Light Blue | Cosmic Black, Aurora Dawn, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,376 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 398 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,300 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 993 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 90.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 - International |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 - International Mali-G78 MP10 - China |
| AnTuTu score | — | 694,499 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,956 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 4 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 5× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,450 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, gyro, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 3.1 | Funtouch OS 14 (International) |
