- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M36 vs Camon 40 Pro 4G
Samsung Galaxy M36 vs Tecno Camon 40 Pro 4G
What Galaxy M36 does better (7) and where Camon 40 Pro 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.0Display8.6
8.0Camera9.1
5.3Battery7.9
8.5Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M36Camon 40 Pro 4G
| Galaxy M36 | Camon 40 Pro 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.4 mm | = |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 74.3 mm | +3.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.3 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 178 g | +19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M36 better than Camon 40 Pro 4G?
- 5GYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- Major OS updates promised6 vs 32×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 40 Pro 4G: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 4+50%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Camon 40 Pro 4G better than Galaxy M36?
- Wired charging25 W vs 45 W+80%
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy M36: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,200 mAh+4%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Weight197 g vs 178 g+11%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 393 ppi+2%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.3 mm+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio86% vs 90%+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.3 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 74.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i |
| Colours | Orange Haze, Velvet Black, Serene Green | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,436 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 90% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek Helio G100 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 600,062 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,953 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,200 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 65% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.38 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | HIOS 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 3 |
