- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M35 vs T3 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Vivo T3 Ultra
What Galaxy M35 does better (5) and where T3 Ultra wins (16) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display9.4
5.7Performance8.4
8.0Camera9.1
7.5Battery8.5
8.7Features6.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M35T3 Ultra
| Galaxy M35 | T3 Ultra | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.2 mm | −1.9 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 74.9 mm | +3.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 7.6 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Weight | 222 g | 192 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M35 better than T3 Ultra?
- NFCYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,500 mAh+9%
- Memory card slotYes · T3 Ultra: No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is T3 Ultra better than Galaxy M35?
- AnTuTu score768,538 vs 1,870,1852.4×
- Wired charging25 W vs 80 W3.2×
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,758 vs 5,471+98%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 4,500 nits4.5×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 50 MP3.8×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.35 GHz+40%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Pixel density390 ppi vs 453 ppi+16%
- Weight222 g vs 192 g+16%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 222 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 7.6 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Schott Xensation Alpha |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray | Lunar Gray, Frost Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 4,500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8% | 90.2% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.35 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| AnTuTu score | 768,538 | 1,870,185 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,758 | 5,471 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 54% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.31 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 14 |
