- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M35 vs Armor 25T
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs UleFone Armor 25T
What Galaxy M35 does better (14) and where Armor 25T wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display7.2
8.0Camera5.9
7.5Battery8.6
8.7Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M35Armor 25T
| Galaxy M35 | Armor 25T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 177.4 mm | −15.1 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 81.4 mm | −2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 12.5 mm | −3.4 mm |
| Weight | 222 g | 326 g | −104 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M35 better than Armor 25T?
- OLED panelYes · Armor 25T: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 25T: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 25T: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Weight222 g vs 326 g+47%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 25T: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Armor 25T: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 12.5 mm+37%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Armor 25T better than Galaxy M35?
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy M35: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,500 mAh+8%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M35: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 222 g | 326 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 12.5 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 177.4 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 81.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8% | 75.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 768,538 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,758 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 30 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.31 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
