- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M35 vs Pova 6 Neo
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Tecno Pova 6 Neo
What Galaxy M35 does better (16) and where Pova 6 Neo wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display6.5
5.7Performance4.4
8.0Camera4.6
7.5Battery8.3
8.7Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M35Pova 6 Neo
| Galaxy M35 | Pova 6 Neo | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 168.6 mm | −6.3 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 76.6 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.2 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 222 g | 206 g | +16 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M35 better than Pova 6 Neo?
- AnTuTu score768,538 vs 568,329+35%
- OLED panelYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- 5GYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,758 vs 1,986+39%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 580 nits+72%
- Memory card slotYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Pova 6 Neo: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
Why is Pova 6 Neo better than Galaxy M35?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+17%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M35: Yes
- Weight222 g vs 206 g+8%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 222 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 9.2 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 168.6 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray | Starry Silver, Speed Black, Comet Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 580 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8% | 84.5% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 768,538 | 568,329 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,758 | 1,986 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.31 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 15 |
