- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M35 vs Aquos sense8
Samsung Galaxy M35 vs Sharp Aquos sense8
What Galaxy M35 does better (10) and where Aquos sense8 wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display7.4
8.0Camera8.0
7.5Battery4.6
8.7Features8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M35Aquos sense8
| Galaxy M35 | Aquos sense8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.3 mm | 153 mm | +9.3 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 71 mm | +7.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 222 g | 159 g | +63 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M35 better than Aquos sense8?
- Stereo speakersYes · Aquos sense8: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Aquos sense8: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.1″+8%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5.1+4%
Why is Aquos sense8 better than Galaxy M35?
- Weight222 g vs 159 g+40%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,300 nits+30%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- eSIMNo · Galaxy M35: Yes
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy M35: Yes
- Pixel density390 ppi vs 422 ppi+8%
- USB version2 vs 3.2+60%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.4 mm+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 222 g | 159 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 162.3 mm | 153 mm |
| Width | 78.6 mm | 71 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Glass | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | — | IP6X |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Dark Blue, Light Blue, Gray | Black, Green, Copper |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.1″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IGZO OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 422 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,300 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.8% | 84.1% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | 768,538 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,758 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | 1/1.55" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | Yes |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.31 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
