- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M17 vs Poco M7 4G
Samsung Galaxy M17 vs Xiaomi Poco M7 4G
What Galaxy M17 does better (12) and where Poco M7 4G wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.4
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery8.3
6.9Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M17Poco M7 4G
| Galaxy M17 | Poco M7 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.1 mm | −6.7 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 80.5 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 224 g | −32 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M17 better than Poco M7 4G?
- OLED panelYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- 5GYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 850 nits+29%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M7 4G: No
- Weight192 g vs 224 g+17%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 374 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.6 mm+15%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is Poco M7 4G better than Galaxy M17?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 144 Hz+60%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.9″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 224 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 171.1 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Moonlight Silver, Sapphire Black | Chrome Silver, Aqua Blue, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 374 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 850 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 84.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 482,788 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,519 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 7,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.64 W/kg | 0.86 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 62 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | B |
