- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M15 vs Armor Mini 20
Samsung Galaxy M15 vs UleFone Armor Mini 20
What Galaxy M15 does better (9) and where Armor Mini 20 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.7Display4.2
6.2Camera5.9
7.5Battery8.2
7.4Features7.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M15Armor Mini 20
| Galaxy M15 | Armor Mini 20 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 133.5 mm | +26.6 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 63.3 mm | +13.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 24.9 mm | −15.6 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 301 g | −84 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M15 better than Armor Mini 20?
- OLED panelYes · Armor Mini 20: No
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 24.9 mm2.7×
- Weight217 g vs 301 g+39%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 4.7″+38%
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor Mini 20: No
- Pixel density396 ppi vs 373 ppi+6%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.3% vs 63.1%+34%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/2+11%
Why is Armor Mini 20 better than Galaxy M15?
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy M15: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,200 mAh+3%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | 301 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 24.9 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 133.5 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 63.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Light Blue, Dark Blue, Gray | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 4.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 396 ppi | 373 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 678 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.3% | 63.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Helio G99 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 477,416 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,884 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/2 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.31" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.78 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 59 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
