- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy M04 vs Galaxy M52 5G
Samsung Galaxy M04 vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
What Galaxy M04 does better (1) and where Galaxy M52 5G wins (23) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Display6.8
2.7Camera7.5
4.0Battery5.3
2.4Features7.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy M04Galaxy M52 5G
| Galaxy M04 | Galaxy M52 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.2 mm | = |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 7.4 mm | +1.7 mm |
| Weight | 188 g | 173 g | +15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy M04 better than Galaxy M52 5G?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Galaxy M52 5G: No
Why is Galaxy M52 5G better than Galaxy M04?
- Main camera13 MP vs 64 MP4.9×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM4 GB vs 8 GB2×
- Wired charging15 W vs 25 W+67%
- OLED panelNo · Galaxy M04: Yes
- 5GNo · Galaxy M04: Yes
- NFCNo · Galaxy M04: Yes
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 393 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera5 MP vs 32 MP6.4×
- Process12 nm vs 6 nm2×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Rear cameras1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 188 g | 173 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 164.2 mm |
| Width | 75.9 mm | 76.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Glass protection | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Sea Glass Green, Shadow Blue | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| OLED panel | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 400 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 777 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.8% | 86.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.35 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | — | 504,424 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,796 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 679 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/2.2 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | — | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 5 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 15 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 30% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -30 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | — | Side |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.29 W/kg | 0.79 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI Core 4.1 | One UI 5.1 |
