- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F70 Pro vs Redmi Note 15
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15
What Galaxy F70 Pro does better (2) and where Redmi Note 15 wins (11) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display8.5
7.9Camera8.6
8.2Battery7.6
6.9Features7.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F70 ProRedmi Note 15
| Galaxy F70 Pro | Redmi Note 15 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 75.4 mm | +2.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm | +0.7 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 178 g | +28 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F70 Pro better than Redmi Note 15?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,520 mAh+9%
- Major OS updates promised6 vs 4+50%
Why is Redmi Note 15 better than Galaxy F70 Pro?
- Main camera50 MP vs 108 MP2.2×
- Peak brightness1,400 nits vs 3,200 nits2.3×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F70 Pro: Yes
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx6+50%
- Weight206 g vs 178 g+16%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 20 MP+67%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.4 mm+9%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 89.7%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 178 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.4 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 164 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 75.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP66 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx6 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Colours | Aurora Green, Alpha Black | Black, Glacier Blue, Mist Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | 3,200 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,524 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 89.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 710 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 637,266 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,958 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 861 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.67" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,520 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Si/C |
| Active use (test) | — | 14.2 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -23.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.5 W/kg | 1 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HyperOS 2 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 4 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | B |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 51 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
Related comparisons
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 4GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.38.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 157.78.6
vs
Samsung Galaxy A37vsXiaomi Redmi Note 158.68.6
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 4G8.68.5
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Pova Curve 28.68.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 15vsTecno Camon 50 Pro 4G8.68.6

