- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F70 Pro vs Pova 8
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro vs Tecno Pova 8
What Galaxy F70 Pro does better (8) and where Pova 8 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display7.4
7.9Camera5.2
8.2Battery9.1
6.9Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F70 ProPova 8
| Galaxy F70 Pro | Pova 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 165.7 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 78.5 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 225 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F70 Pro better than Pova 8?
- OLED panelYes · Pova 8: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Pova 8: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Pova 8: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight206 g vs 225 g+9%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 8.8 mm+9%
Why is Pova 8 better than Galaxy F70 Pro?
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+33%
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F70 Pro: Yes
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 225 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 78.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Aurora Green, Alpha Black | Arc White, Graphite Black, Helios Orange, Echo Green, Bit White (India), Terminal Green (India) |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,344 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 381 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 991 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 86.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Mediatek Dimensity 7100 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G610 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 666,199 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,914 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 695 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 8,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 17.3 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 43% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.8 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.5 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
