- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F70 Pro vs Camon 50 4G
Samsung Galaxy F70 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 4G
What Galaxy F70 Pro does better (6) and where Camon 50 4G wins (12) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display9.7
7.9Camera8.2
8.2Battery8.5
6.9Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F70 ProCamon 50 4G
| Galaxy F70 Pro | Camon 50 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm | = |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 77.2 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.6 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 172 g | +34 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F70 Pro better than Camon 50 4G?
- 5GYes · Camon 50 4G: No
- Major OS updates promised6 vs 32×
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Camon 50 4G better than Galaxy F70 Pro?
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F70 Pro: Yes
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+2%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 144 Hz+20%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Weight206 g vs 172 g+20%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 429 ppi+11%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,208 px+12%
- Thickness8.1 mm vs 7.5 mm+8%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.3+4%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.8% vs 89.4%+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 172 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Unspecified |
| Colours | Aurora Green, Alpha Black | Moonlight black, Malachite green, Nebula titanium, Fir green, Lavender mist, Mint cream |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,208 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,644 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 89.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Mediatek Helio G200 Ultimate |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 595,376 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,020 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 6,150 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 45 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 44% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.5 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HIOS 16 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 3 |
