- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F62 vs Redmi K40 Gaming
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
What Galaxy F62 does better (5) and where Redmi K40 Gaming wins (13) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display7.2
7.5Camera7.2
8.0Battery8.0
7.1Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F62Redmi K40 Gaming
| Galaxy F62 | Redmi K40 Gaming | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 161.9 mm | +2 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.9 mm | −0.6 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.3 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 205 g | +13 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F62 better than Redmi K40 Gaming?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,065 mAh+38%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K40 Gaming: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K40 Gaming: No
- 3.5 mm headphone jackYes · Redmi K40 Gaming: No
Why is Redmi K40 Gaming better than Galaxy F62?
- Wired charging25 W vs 67 W2.7×
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 120 Hz2×
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F62: Yes
- Peak brightness420 nits vs 500 nits+19%
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 3 GHz+10%
- Weight218 g vs 205 g+6%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
- Process7 nm vs 6 nm+17%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+14%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.7+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 205 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 161.9 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 76.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | — | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | OLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | 500 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 86.3% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 3 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,065 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 71% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.74 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | MIUI 12.5 |
