- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F62 vs Power Armor 13
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs UleFone Power Armor 13
What Galaxy F62 does better (10) and where Power Armor 13 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display5.0
7.5Camera6.5
8.0Battery8.8
7.1Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F62Power Armor 13
| Galaxy F62 | Power Armor 13 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 183.7 mm | −19.8 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 85.4 mm | −9.1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 20.8 mm | −11.3 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 492 g | −274 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F62 better than Power Armor 13?
- Weight218 g vs 492 g2.3×
- OLED panelYes · Power Armor 13: No
- 5GYes · Power Armor 13: No
- Main camera64 MP vs 48 MP+33%
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+33%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 20.8 mm2.2×
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Power Armor 13: No
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.7% vs 71.4%+21%
Why is Power Armor 13 better than Galaxy F62?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 13,200 mAh+89%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy F62: Yes
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 492 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 20.8 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 183.7 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 85.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 386 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | — | 401 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 71.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 294,194 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,610 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/2.0" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 13,200 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | Yes |
| Wireless charging power | — | 15 W |
| Reverse wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -28.3 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| SAR (head) | 0.74 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
