- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F62 vs Camon 17 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F62 vs Tecno Camon 17 Pro
What Galaxy F62 does better (8) and where Camon 17 Pro wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Display5.4
7.5Camera7.6
8.0Battery6.0
7.1Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F62Camon 17 Pro
| Galaxy F62 | Camon 17 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 168.9 mm | −5 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 77 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 9 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 218 g | 201 g | +17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F62 better than Camon 17 Pro?
- Battery capacity7,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+40%
- OLED panelYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- 5GYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- NFCYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- CPU frequency2.73 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+33%
- 4K selfie videoYes · Camon 17 Pro: No
- Process7 nm vs 12 nm+71%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.7% vs 84.4%+3%
Why is Camon 17 Pro better than Galaxy F62?
- Refresh rate60 Hz vs 90 Hz+50%
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Peak brightness420 nits vs 500 nits+19%
- Weight218 g vs 201 g+8%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 48 MP+50%
- Thickness9.5 mm vs 9 mm+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 218 g | 201 g |
| Thickness | 9.5 mm | 9 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 168.9 mm |
| Width | 76.3 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | — |
| Colours | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | California Silver, Malibu Blue |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 420 nits | 500 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 538 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 84.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.73 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 309,107 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,668 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.73" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 48 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 7,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -24.4 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.74 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | HiOS 7.6 |
