- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F36 vs Armor X16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F36 vs UleFone Armor X16 Pro
What Galaxy F36 does better (14) and where Armor X16 Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display5.8
8.0Camera6.1
5.3Battery8.6
8.5Features7.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F36Armor X16 Pro
| Galaxy F36 | Armor X16 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 173.8 mm | −9.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 83.4 mm | −5.5 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 18 mm | −10.3 mm |
| Weight | 197 g | 395 g | −198 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F36 better than Armor X16 Pro?
- Weight197 g vs 395 g2×
- OLED panelYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Pixel density387 ppi vs 269 ppi+44%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 18 mm2.3×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Armor X16 Pro: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.6″+2%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is Armor X16 Pro better than Galaxy F36?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 10,360 mAh2.1×
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy F36: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 197 g | 395 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 18 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 173.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 83.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Silicone polymer | — |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Luxe Violet, Coral Red, Onyx Black | Wasteland Shadow/Sand Dune |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 910 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2% | 71.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | 1/1.73" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 10,360 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Barometer | — | Yes |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| SAR (head) | 0.38 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 1,000 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 115 h |
| Repairability class | — | C |
| Drop resistance class | — | A |
