- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F17 vs nubia Neo 3
Samsung Galaxy F17 vs ZTE nubia Neo 3
What Galaxy F17 does better (11) and where nubia Neo 3 wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display7.1
5.0Performance4.9
7.8Camera5.5
5.3Battery7.8
6.9Features8.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F17nubia Neo 3
| Galaxy F17 | nubia Neo 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 168.3 mm | −3.9 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.5 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.8 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 209 g | −17 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F17 better than nubia Neo 3?
- OLED panelYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,242 vs 2,073+8%
- Memory card slotYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia Neo 3: No
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,000 nits+10%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Weight192 g vs 209 g+9%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 8.3 mm+11%
Why is nubia Neo 3 better than Galaxy F17?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F17: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- AnTuTu score571,738 vs 639,225+12%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Wired charging25 W vs 33 W+32%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 209 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 168.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, Violet | Shadow Black, Cyber Silver, Titanium Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,392 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 386 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 86.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,738 | 639,225 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,242 | 2,073 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 33 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.64 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | A |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 61 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
