- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F17 vs Y400 4G
Samsung Galaxy F17 vs Vivo Y400 4G
What Galaxy F17 does better (9) and where Y400 4G wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display8.4
7.8Camera4.6
5.3Battery8.2
6.9Features8.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F17Y400 4G
| Galaxy F17 | Y400 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 162.3 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.3 mm | +2.6 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 196 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F17 better than Y400 4G?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y400 4G: No
- Memory card slotYes · Y400 4G: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y400 4G: No
- Weight192 g vs 196 g+2%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
- Thickness7.5 mm vs 7.9 mm+5%
Why is Y400 4G better than Galaxy F17?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx82×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F17: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Peak brightness1,100 nits vs 1,800 nits+64%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Screen-to-body ratio86% vs 87.9%+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 196 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 7.9 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 162.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 75.3 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, Violet | Purple Twilight, Tropical Green (Dynamic Green), Pearl White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 87.9% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Adreno 610 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,738 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,242 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.96" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Si/C |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.64 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
