- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F17 vs iQOO Z10 Lite
Samsung Galaxy F17 vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Lite
What Galaxy F17 does better (17) and where iQOO Z10 Lite wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Display5.4
5.0Performance4.0
7.8Camera4.1
5.3Battery6.6
6.9Features4.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F17iQOO Z10 Lite
| Galaxy F17 | iQOO Z10 Lite | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 167.3 mm | −2.9 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77 mm | +0.9 mm |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.7 mm |
| Weight | 192 g | 202 g | −10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F17 better than iQOO Z10 Lite?
- Major OS updates promised6 vs 23×
- Wired charging25 W vs 15 W+67%
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z10 Lite: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z10 Lite: No
- NFCYes · iQOO Z10 Lite: No
- AnTuTu score571,738 vs 501,473+14%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,242 vs 1,775+26%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 260 ppi+48%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 5 MP2.6×
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 64 GB2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z10 Lite: No
Why is iQOO Z10 Lite better than Galaxy F17?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F17: Yes
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy F17: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 192 g | 202 g |
| Thickness | 7.5 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 167.3 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | — |
| Colours | Black, Violet | Titanium Blue, Cyber Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,100 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 85.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | 571,738 | 501,473 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,242 | 1,775 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 15 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 47% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.64 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 15 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 2 |
