- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F16 vs Blade V70 Design
Samsung Galaxy F16 vs ZTE Blade V70 Design
What Galaxy F16 does better (10) and where Blade V70 Design wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.0Display6.0
6.2Camera5.5
5.3Battery5.1
6.9Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F16Blade V70 Design
| Galaxy F16 | Blade V70 Design | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.4 mm | 165.8 mm | −1.4 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77.1 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm | −0.3 mm |
| Weight | 191 g | 206 g | −15 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F16 better than Blade V70 Design?
- OLED panelYes · Blade V70 Design: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+50%
- Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 264 ppi+46%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V70 Design: No
- Weight191 g vs 206 g+8%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Thickness7.9 mm vs 8.2 mm+4%
Why is Blade V70 Design better than Galaxy F16?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy F16: Yes
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 191 g | 206 g |
| Thickness | 7.9 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 164.4 mm | 165.8 mm |
| Width | 77.9 mm | 77.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP54 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | Bling Black, Vibing Blue, Glam Green | Stone gray, Rose pink, Citrus orange, Jade green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 264 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86% | 84.4% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 | Unisoc T606 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Unisoc |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 22 W |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.99 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | — | C |
| Battery charge cycles | — | 800 |
| Endurance per cycle | — | 41 h |
| Repairability class | — | B |
| Drop resistance class | — | D |
