- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F15 vs Spark 30C
Samsung Galaxy F15 vs Tecno Spark 30C
What Galaxy F15 does better (13) and where Spark 30C wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display4.9
6.2Camera4.6
7.5Battery4.6
5.0Features3.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F15Spark 30C
| Galaxy F15 | Spark 30C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.9 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.5 mm | +0.8 mm |
| Weight | 217 g | 187 g | +30 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F15 better than Spark 30C?
- OLED panelYes · Spark 30C: No
- 5GYes · Spark 30C: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Pixel density390 ppi vs 263 ppi+48%
- Process6 nm vs 12 nm2×
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark 30C: No
- CPU frequency2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz+10%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Spark 30C better than Galaxy F15?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Stereo speakersNo · Galaxy F15: Yes
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Weight217 g vs 187 g+16%
- Thickness9.3 mm vs 8.5 mm+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 217 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 9.3 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 160.1 mm | 163.9 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | — | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | Ash Black, Groovy Violet, Jazzy Green | Orbit Black, Orbit White, Magic Skin 3.0 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 450 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87% | 86.2% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ | Mediatek Helio G81 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | MediaTek |
| Process | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 354,460 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,380 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 38% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.71 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | HiOS 13 |
