- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy F14 vs Spark 10 Pro
Samsung Galaxy F14 vs Tecno Spark 10 Pro
What Galaxy F14 does better (6) and where Spark 10 Pro wins (9) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Display5.7
5.2Camera5.9
7.5Battery4.6
5.0Features4.3
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy F14Spark 10 Pro
| Galaxy F14 | Spark 10 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 166.8 mm | 168.4 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.2 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.4 mm | +1 mm |
| Weight | 206 g | 208 g | −2 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy F14 better than Spark 10 Pro?
- 5GYes · Spark 10 Pro: No
- Battery capacity6,000 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+20%
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2 GHz+20%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 4+25%
Why is Spark 10 Pro better than Galaxy F14?
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- NFCNo · Galaxy F14: Yes
- RAM6 GB vs 8 GB+33%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 32 MP2.5×
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.8″+3%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.6+12%
- Thickness9.4 mm vs 8.4 mm+12%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.5% vs 85.1%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 206 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 9.4 mm | 8.4 mm |
| Height | 166.8 mm | 168.4 mm |
| Width | 77.2 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Black, Green, Purple | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,408 px | 2,460 px |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 580 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 521 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.5% | 85.1% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 249,938 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 1,358 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 1 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | No | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 35% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -29.2 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.69 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI Core 5.1 | HIOS 12.6 |
