- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy C55 vs V30 Pro
Samsung Galaxy C55 vs Vivo V30 Pro
What Galaxy C55 does better (5) and where V30 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Display9.3
8.5Camera8.4
6.8Battery6.7
8.2Features5.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy C55V30 Pro
| Galaxy C55 | V30 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.4 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.1 mm | +1.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.3 mm |
| Weight | 180 g | 188 g | −8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy C55 better than V30 Pro?
- Stereo speakersYes · V30 Pro: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Memory card slotYes · V30 Pro: No
- Weight180 g vs 188 g+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is V30 Pro better than Galaxy C55?
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 2,800 nits2.8×
- Wired charging45 W vs 80 W+78%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Telephoto cameraNo · Galaxy C55: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 3.1 GHz+29%
- Pixel density393 ppi vs 453 ppi+15%
- Rear cameras2 vs 3+50%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,260 px+17%
- Screen-to-body ratio86.4% vs 89.9%+4%
- Thickness7.8 mm vs 7.5 mm+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 180 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 163.9 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 76.5 mm | 75.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | — | Schott α glass |
| Colours | Black, Orange | Bloom White, Waving Aqua, Lush Green, Noble Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED+ | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,260 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,800 px |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 453 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 2,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 1,197 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4% | 89.9% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 841,083 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 3,982 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 1,815 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.49" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 3 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | Yes |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | — | 13.4 h |
| Wired charging | 45 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 70% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Dual-band GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -27.5 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6.1 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | — | 2 |
