- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A72 vs Armor 9E
Samsung Galaxy A72 vs UleFone Armor 9E
What Galaxy A72 does better (17) and where Armor 9E wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.1Display4.1
9.2Camera6.7
5.3Battery7.5
5.9Features6.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A72Armor 9E
| Galaxy A72 | Armor 9E | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 165 mm | 168.2 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 82 mm | −4.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 15 mm | −6.6 mm |
| Weight | 203 g | 324 g | −121 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A72 better than Armor 9E?
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 60 Hz+50%
- OLED panelYes · Armor 9E: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 9E: No
- Telephoto cameraYes · Armor 9E: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Armor 9E: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Weight203 g vs 324 g+60%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- 4K selfie videoYes · Armor 9E: No
- Thickness8.4 mm vs 15 mm+79%
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.3″+6%
Why is Armor 9E better than Galaxy A72?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh+32%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%
- Pixel density394 ppi vs 409 ppi+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 203 g | 324 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 15 mm |
| Height | 165 mm | 168.2 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 82 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.3″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 409 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 825 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.4% | 70.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | MediaTek |
| Process | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| AnTuTu score | 279,342 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 6,483 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 313 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 3 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | Yes | No |
| Optical zoom | 3× | — |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,600 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 54% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | No | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| SAR (head) | 0.23 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | upgradable to Android 14 One UI 6.1 | — |
