- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A57 vs RugOne Xever 8
Samsung Galaxy A57 vs UleFone RugOne Xever 8
What Galaxy A57 does better (14) and where RugOne Xever 8 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.1Display4.2
7.9Camera6.8
6.7Battery3.2
9.8Features6.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A57RugOne Xever 8
| Galaxy A57 | RugOne Xever 8 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.5 mm | 168 mm | −6.5 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 80 mm | −3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 14 mm | −7.1 mm |
| Weight | 179 g | 320 g | −141 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A57 better than RugOne Xever 8?
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
- Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 680 nits2.8×
- RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
- OLED panelYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- 5GYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Weight179 g vs 320 g+79%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,700 mAh+6%
- Thickness6.9 mm vs 14 mm2×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- eSIMYes · RugOne Xever 8: No
- Screen size6.7″ vs 6.5″+3%
Why is RugOne Xever 8 better than Galaxy A57?
- Main camera50 MP vs 64 MP+28%
- Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 179 g | 320 g |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm | 14 mm |
| Height | 161.5 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 76.8 mm | 80 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | — |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP68 | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx8 | IPx8 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Gorilla Glass |
| Colours | Navy, Gray, Icyblue, Lilac | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.5″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED+ | LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,900 nits | 680 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,309 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.8% | — |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1680 | Mediatek Helio G200 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Mediatek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.9 GHz | — |
| GPU | Xclipse 550 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 1,001,995 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 4,411 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,742 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 512 GB | — |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | — |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | No | — |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | — |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,700 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 14 h | — |
| Wired charging | 45 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 64% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 6 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | — |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | — |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | — |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.3 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | — |
| SAR (head) | 0.7 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | A |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 52 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | A | — |
