- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A55 vs V40 Lite (IDN)
Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Vivo V40 Lite (IDN)
What Galaxy A55 does better (8) and where V40 Lite (IDN) wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display8.4
8.3Camera6.8
5.0Battery7.4
8.5Features6.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A55V40 Lite (IDN)
| Galaxy A55 | V40 Lite (IDN) | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.2 mm | −2.1 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 75.9 mm | +1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm | +0.4 mm |
| Weight | 213 g | 188 g | +25 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A55 better than V40 Lite (IDN)?
- Optical stabilisationYes · V40 Lite (IDN): No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+25%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · V40 Lite (IDN): No
- eSIMYes · V40 Lite (IDN): No
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Bluetooth5.3 vs 5+6%
Why is V40 Lite (IDN) better than Galaxy A55?
- Wired charging25 W vs 80 W3.2×
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 1,800 nits+80%
- Weight213 g vs 188 g+13%
- Charged in 30 min55% vs 80%+45%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.8 mm+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | 188 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.8 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.2 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 75.9 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | Titanium Silver, Carbon Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,010 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | 86.7% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1480 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.75 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 530 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 635,598 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,259 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,024 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/1.95" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 13.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 80 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 14 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
