- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A55 vs Spark 20P
Samsung Galaxy A55 vs Tecno Spark 20P
What Galaxy A55 does better (16) and where Spark 20P wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display4.8
8.3Camera4.6
5.0Battery4.6
8.5Features6.6
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A55Spark 20P
| Galaxy A55 | Spark 20P | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.7 mm | −2.6 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 75.6 mm | +1.8 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm | −0.4 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A55 better than Spark 20P?
- RAM12 GB vs 4 GB3×
- OLED panelYes · Spark 20P: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Spark 20P: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Pixel density390 ppi vs 267 ppi+46%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 8 MP4×
- CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Spark 20P: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Spark 20P: No
Why is Spark 20P better than Galaxy A55?
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A55: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 213 g | — |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.6 mm |
| Height | 161.1 mm | 163.7 mm |
| Width | 77.4 mm | 75.6 mm |
| Frame | Aluminium | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | Alpenglow Gold, Magic Skin |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.6″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,612 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 267 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 1,010 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.8% | 84.6% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1480 | Mediatek |
| Chip maker | Exynos | MediaTek |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.75 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Xclipse 530 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 635,598 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 3,259 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,024 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.56" | 1/2.8" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 13.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 55% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 4 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -25.7 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Barometer | Yes | — |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.68 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
