android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A53 5G vs Bison GT2 Pro

Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro

What Galaxy A53 5G does better (13) and where Bison GT2 Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2022Galaxy A53 5G

7.4Score

13 advantages≈ $155

Higher score

Umidigi · 2022Bison GT2 Pro

7.4Score

4 advantages

7.4Display5.3

8.7Camera7.1

5.3Battery7.3

7.7Features7.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A53 5GBison GT2 Pro

	Galaxy A53 5G	Bison GT2 Pro	Difference
Height	159.6 mm	172.2 mm	−12.6 mm
Width	74.8 mm	83.9 mm	−9.1 mm
Thickness	8.1 mm	12.9 mm	−4.8 mm
Weight	189 g	280 g	−91 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A53 5G better than Bison GT2 Pro?

OLED panelYes · Bison GT2 Pro: No
Optical stabilisationYes · Bison GT2 Pro: No
Stereo speakersYes · Bison GT2 Pro: No
Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
Weight189 g vs 280 g+48%
Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Bison GT2 Pro: No
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.05 GHz+17%
Thickness8.1 mm vs 12.9 mm+59%
Selfie camera32 MP vs 24 MP+33%

Why is Bison GT2 Pro better than Galaxy A53 5G?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,150 mAh+23%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A53 5G: Yes
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx8+14%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A53 5G≈ $1557.4	Umidigi Bison GT2 Pro7.4
Design
Weight	189 g	280 g
Thickness	8.1 mm	12.9 mm
Height	159.6 mm	172.2 mm
Width	74.8 mm	83.9 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Plastic	—
Ingress protection	IP67	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx7	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	—
Colours	Black, White, Blue, Peach	Hack Black
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.5″
Panel	Super AMOLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,400 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	405 ppi	405 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	90 Hz
Peak brightness	800 nits	—
Measured brightness	830 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	85.4%	70.6%
HDR	Yes	—
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1280	Mediatek Helio G95
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	5 nm	12 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.05 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68	Mali-G76 MC4
AnTuTu score	329,802	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	1,891	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	635	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.1
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	64 MP	64 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.72"	—
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	32 MP	24 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	6,150 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Wired charging	25 W	18 W
Charged in 30 min	45%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	—
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.1	5
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C
USB version	2	—
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-26.5 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	Yes	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature)
SAR (head)	0.89 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 12	Android 12
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8	—
Major OS updates promised	4	—