- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52s 5G vs Redmi K30 5G Racing
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi K30 5G Racing
What Galaxy A52s 5G does better (14) and where Redmi K30 5G Racing wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display6.7
8.7Camera7.4
3.2Battery3.8
8.2Features7.1
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52s 5GRedmi K30 5G Racing
| Galaxy A52s 5G | Redmi K30 5G Racing | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 165.3 mm | −5.4 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.6 mm | −1.5 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.8 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 208 g | −19 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than Redmi K30 5G Racing?
- OLED panelYes · Redmi K30 5G Racing: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Redmi K30 5G Racing: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Redmi K30 5G Racing: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi K30 5G Racing: No
- 4K selfie videoYes · Redmi K30 5G Racing: No
- Weight189 g vs 208 g+10%
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 20 MP+60%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
- Process6 nm vs 7 nm+17%
Why is Redmi K30 5G Racing better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 30 W+20%
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz+17%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 208 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.8 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 165.3 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.6 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Aluminium |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | Mint, Blue, Red, Purple, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 84.8% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SDM768 Snapdragon 768G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 620 |
| AnTuTu score | 429,675 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,060 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 685 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.72" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 4,500 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 30 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 53% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.88 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | MIUI 11 |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A05svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.87.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A327.75.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A04svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G8.57.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G7.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 127.76.4

