- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A52s 5G vs iQOO Z5
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs Vivo iQOO Z5
What Galaxy A52s 5G does better (11) and where iQOO Z5 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display6.3
8.7Camera7.8
3.2Battery6.5
8.2Features5.0
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A52s 5GiQOO Z5
| Galaxy A52s 5G | iQOO Z5 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.9 mm | 164.7 mm | −4.8 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.7 mm | −1.6 mm |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm | −0.1 mm |
| Weight | 189 g | 193 g | −4 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A52s 5G better than iQOO Z5?
- OLED panelYes · iQOO Z5: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z5: No
- NFCYes · iQOO Z5: No
- Stereo speakersYes · iQOO Z5: No
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 650 nits+23%
- Memory card slotYes · iQOO Z5: No
- Selfie camera32 MP vs 16 MP2×
- 4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z5: No
- Pixel density405 ppi vs 395 ppi+3%
- Weight189 g vs 193 g+2%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 6 vs Wi-Fi 5+20%
Why is iQOO Z5 better than Galaxy A52s 5G?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
- Battery capacity4,500 mAh vs 5,000 mAh+11%
- 4K video frame rate30 fps vs 60 fps2×
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
- Charged in 30 min53% vs 58%+9%
- Bluetooth5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 189 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm | 8.5 mm |
| Height | 159.9 mm | 164.7 mm |
| Width | 75.1 mm | 76.7 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Panda Glass |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint | Arctic Dawn, Mystic Space, Cyber Grid, Aurora |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 650 nits |
| Measured brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 85% |
| HDR | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 642L |
| AnTuTu score | 429,675 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 11,060 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 685 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/1.97" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 60 fps |
| Selfie camera | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 4,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 53% | 58% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.88 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 6 | Funtouch 12 (International) |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy A05svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.87.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsSamsung Galaxy A327.75.8
vs
Samsung Galaxy A04svsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G4.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23vsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G8.57.7
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 ProvsSamsung Galaxy A52s 5G7.47.7
vs
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5GvsXiaomi Redmi Note 127.76.4

