android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A37 vs Z-Play

Samsung Galaxy A37 vs ZEED Z-Play

What Galaxy A37 does better (9) and where Z-Play wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A37

8.6Score

9 advantages≈ $290

ZEED · 2026Z-Play

8.7Score

7 advantages

Higher score

8.4Display9.4

8.0Camera6.7

6.4Battery8.3

9.7Features8.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A37Z-Play

	Galaxy A37	Z-Play	Difference
Height	162.9 mm	163.2 mm	−0.3 mm
Width	78.2 mm	77.5 mm	+0.7 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.8 mm	−1.4 mm
Weight	196 g	202 g	−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A37 better than Z-Play?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Optical stabilisationYes · Z-Play: No
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
eSIMYes · Z-Play: No
CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+6%
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,800 nits+6%
Weight196 g vs 202 g+3%
Thickness7.4 mm vs 8.8 mm+19%

Why is Z-Play better than Galaxy A37?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,000 mAh+40%
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy A37: Yes
Pixel density385 ppi vs 450 ppi+17%
Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 1,272 px+18%
Selfie camera12 MP vs 13 MP+8%
Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 88.9%+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A37≈ $2908.6	ZEED Z-Play8.7
Design
Weight	196 g	202 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.8 mm
Height	162.9 mm	163.2 mm
Width	78.2 mm	77.5 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx5
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	Oleophobic coating
Colours	Graygreen, Charkoal, White, Light Violet	Red, Black, Green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,272 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,772 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	450 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,246 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.5%	88.9%
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1480	Mediatek Dimensity 7400
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.75 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 530	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	697,795	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,345	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,035	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	—
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/2.51"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	Yes
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	12 MP	13 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	Yes
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	7,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	13.8 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.72 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	—
Major OS updates promised	6	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	53 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	B	—