android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A37 vs Poco M8 Power

Samsung Galaxy A37 vs Xiaomi Poco M8 Power

What Galaxy A37 does better (19) and where Poco M8 Power wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A37

8.6Score

19 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

Xiaomi · 2026Poco M8 Power

8.1Score

4 advantages≈ $270

8.4Display8.5

6.5Performance5.2

7.9Camera4.6

6.4Battery9.0

9.7Features8.0

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A37Poco M8 Power

	Galaxy A37	Poco M8 Power	Difference
Height	162.9 mm	169.7 mm	−6.8 mm
Width	78.2 mm	79.1 mm	−0.9 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.5 mm	−1.1 mm
Weight	196 g	225 g	−29 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A37 better than Poco M8 Power?

RAM12 GB vs 8 GB+50%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
Optical stabilisationYes · Poco M8 Power: No
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,345 vs 2,328+44%
AnTuTu score697,795 vs 611,651+14%
Water resistance (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx5+60%
Major OS updates promised6 vs 4+50%
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Poco M8 Power: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Poco M8 Power: No
eSIMYes · Poco M8 Power: No

Why is Poco M8 Power better than Galaxy A37?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 8,000 mAh+60%
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy A37: Yes
Screen size6.7″ vs 7″+4%
Screen-to-body ratio86.5% vs 88.4%+2%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A37≈ $2908.6	Xiaomi Poco M8 Power≈ $2708.1
Design
Weight	196 g	225 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.5 mm
Height	162.9 mm	169.7 mm
Width	78.2 mm	79.1 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP65
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx5
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	Corning Gorilla Glass 7i
Colours	Graygreen, Charkoal, White, Light Violet	Black, Green, Blaze Orange
Display
Screen size	6.7″	7″
Panel	Super AMOLED	AMOLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,396 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	375 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,800 nits
Measured brightness	1,246 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.5%	88.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1480	Qualcomm SM4450-AF Snapdragon 4 Gen 4
Chip maker	Exynos	Qualcomm
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.75 GHz	2.3 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 530	Adreno 613
AnTuTu score	697,795	611,651
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,345	2,328
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,035	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	8 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	128 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.8
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/2.76"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	8,000 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Si/C
Active use (test)	13.8 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.1
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Infrared port	—	Yes
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Under display
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass
SAR (head)	0.72 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	HyperOS 3
Major OS updates promised	6	4
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	53 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	B	—