android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A37 vs iQOO Z11x (China)

Samsung Galaxy A37 vs Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)

What Galaxy A37 does better (14) and where iQOO Z11x (China) wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A37

8.6Score

14 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

Vivo · 2026iQOO Z11x (China)

8.3Score

4 advantages≈ $210

8.4Display7.1

6.5Performance7.0

7.9Camera5.4

6.4Battery8.7

9.7Features8.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A37iQOO Z11x (China)

	Galaxy A37	iQOO Z11x (China)	Difference
Height	162.9 mm	166.6 mm	−3.7 mm
Width	78.2 mm	78.4 mm	−0.2 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.4 mm	−1 mm
Weight	196 g	219 g	−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A37 better than iQOO Z11x (China)?

OLED panelYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Optical stabilisationYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Peak brightness1,900 nits vs 1,200 nits+58%
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)3,345 vs 2,988+12%
Wired charging45 W vs 44 W+2%
Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
4K selfie videoYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
eSIMYes · iQOO Z11x (China): No
Weight196 g vs 219 g+12%
Charged in 30 min62% vs 35%+77%
CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+6%

Why is iQOO Z11x (China) better than Galaxy A37?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 7,200 mAh+44%
AnTuTu score697,795 vs 983,562+41%
Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A37≈ $2908.6	Vivo iQOO Z11x (China)≈ $2108.3
Design
Weight	196 g	219 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	8.4 mm
Height	162.9 mm	166.6 mm
Width	78.2 mm	78.4 mm
Frame	Plastic	Plastic
Back	Glass	Plastic
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	—
Colours	Graygreen, Charkoal, White, Light Violet	Black, White, Green
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Super AMOLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,344 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	382 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	1,200 nits
Measured brightness	1,246 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.5%	85.8%
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1480	Mediatek Dimensity 7400
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	4 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.75 GHz	2.6 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 530	Mali-G615 MC2
AnTuTu score	697,795	983,562
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,345	2,988
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,035	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	512 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1
Memory card slot	No	No
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	—
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/2.93"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	4K
4K video frame rate	30 fps	30 fps
Selfie camera	12 MP	8 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	7,200 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Si/C
Active use (test)	13.8 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	44 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	35%
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth	5.4	5.4
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	No
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
SAR (head)	0.72 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 16
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	OriginOS 6
Major OS updates promised	6	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	53 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	B	—