android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A37 vs Armor 27T+

Samsung Galaxy A37 vs UleFone Armor 27T+

What Galaxy A37 does better (16) and where Armor 27T+ wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2026Galaxy A37

8.6Score

16 advantages≈ $290

Higher score

UleFone · 2026Armor 27T+

8.1Score

7 advantages

8.4Display7.2

7.9Camera5.9

6.4Battery9.1

9.7Features7.3

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A37Armor 27T+

	Galaxy A37	Armor 27T+	Difference
Height	162.9 mm	182.8 mm	−19.9 mm
Width	78.2 mm	86.8 mm	−8.6 mm
Thickness	7.4 mm	18.5 mm	−11.1 mm
Weight	196 g	441 g	−245 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A37 better than Armor 27T+?

Weight196 g vs 441 g2.2×
OLED panelYes · Armor 27T+: No
Optical stabilisationYes · Armor 27T+: No
Stereo speakersYes · Armor 27T+: No
Wired charging45 W vs 33 W+36%
Thickness7.4 mm vs 18.5 mm2.5×
CPU frequency2.75 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+25%
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Armor 27T+: No
Max video4K vs 1080p
4K selfie videoYes · Armor 27T+: No
eSIMYes · Armor 27T+: No
Process4 nm vs 6 nm+50%

Why is Armor 27T+ better than Galaxy A37?

Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 10,600 mAh2.1×
Wireless chargingNo · Galaxy A37: Yes
Selfie camera12 MP vs 32 MP2.7×
Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
Memory card slotNo · Galaxy A37: Yes
3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A37: Yes
Pixel density385 ppi vs 396 ppi+3%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A37≈ $2908.6	UleFone Armor 27T+8.1
Design
Weight	196 g	441 g
Thickness	7.4 mm	18.5 mm
Height	162.9 mm	182.8 mm
Width	78.2 mm	86.8 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Glass	—
Ingress protection	IP68	IP68
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx8	IPx8
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Colours	Graygreen, Charkoal, White, Light Violet	Black
Display
Screen size	6.7″	6.8″
Panel	Super AMOLED	IPS LCD
OLED panel	Yes	No
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,460 px
Pixel density	385 ppi	396 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,900 nits	—
Measured brightness	1,246 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	86.5%	68.8%
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1480	Mediatek Helio G99
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	4 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.75 GHz	2.2 GHz
GPU	Xclipse 530	Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score	697,795	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	3,345	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	1,035	—
Memory
RAM	12 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	256 GB
Storage type	UFS 3.1	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	No	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/2
Main sensor size	1/1.56"	1/1.31"
Rear cameras	2	2
Optical stabilisation	Yes	No
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	12 MP	32 MP
4K selfie video	Yes	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	10,600 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	Li-Po
Active use (test)	13.8 h	—
Wired charging	45 W	33 W
Charged in 30 min	62%	—
Wireless charging	No	Yes
Wireless charging power	—	30 W
Reverse wireless charging	—	Yes
Connectivity
5G	Yes	—
eSIM	Yes	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 6	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.4	5.2
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	No
3.5 mm headphone jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-25.7 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Under display	Side
Barometer	—	Yes
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer
SAR (head)	0.72 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 16	Android 15
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 9	—
Major OS updates promised	6	—
EU label
Energy class	A	—
Battery charge cycles	1,200	—
Endurance per cycle	53 h	—
Repairability class	C	—
Drop resistance class	B	—