- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A35 vs Poco C75 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Xiaomi Poco C75 5G
What Galaxy A35 does better (23) and where Poco C75 5G wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display5.9
5.2Performance3.4
8.0Camera4.1
4.2Battery6.3
8.5Features4.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A35Poco C75 5G
| Galaxy A35 | Poco C75 5G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.7 mm | 171.9 mm | −10.2 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm | = |
| Weight | 209 g | 212 g | −3 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A35 better than Poco C75 5G?
- RAM12 GB vs 4 GB3×
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme806 vs 1415.7×
- AnTuTu score522,829 vs 391,505+34%
- OLED panelYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- NFCYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Poco C75 5G: No
- Major OS updates promised4 vs 22×
- Wired charging25 W vs 18 W+39%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,740 vs 2,014+36%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 600 nits+67%
Why is Poco C75 5G better than Galaxy A35?
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,160 mAh+3%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A35: Yes
- Screen size6.6″ vs 6.9″+4%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 212 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8.2 mm |
| Height | 161.7 mm | 171.9 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 77.8 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | — |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | Aqua Bliss, Enchanted Green, Silver Stardust |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.9″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 600 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,024 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 84% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm SM4635 Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 611 |
| AnTuTu score | 522,829 | 391,505 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,740 | 2,014 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 806 | 141 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 5 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,160 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | 12.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 18 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.44 W/kg | 0.85 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | HyperOS |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | 2 |
