- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A35 vs Y200i
Samsung Galaxy A35 vs Vivo Y200i
What Galaxy A35 does better (15) and where Y200i wins (8) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.4Display6.9
8.0Camera4.6
4.2Battery8.2
8.5Features5.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A35Y200i
| Galaxy A35 | Y200i | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.7 mm | 165.7 mm | −4 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 76 mm | +2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 209 g | 199 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A35 better than Y200i?
- OLED panelYes · Y200i: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y200i: No
- NFCYes · Y200i: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Memory card slotYes · Y200i: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200i: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y200i: No
- eSIMYes · Y200i: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
Why is Y200i better than Galaxy A35?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 512 GB2×
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
- Storage (base)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A35: Yes
- Weight209 g vs 199 g+5%
- Process5 nm vs 4 nm+25%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 8 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 209 g | 199 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 161.7 mm | 165.7 mm |
| Width | 78 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,408 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,024 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.8% | 86.4% |
| HDR | Yes | — |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Qualcomm |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Adreno 613 |
| AnTuTu score | 522,829 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,740 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 806 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/1.96" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 12.4 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 52% | 42% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 6 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.44 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 7 | OriginOS 4 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
