How we scoreBlogAdvertise
android.gsdevices · specs · comparisons
  1. android.gs
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy A34 vs Blade V40

Samsung Galaxy A34 vs ZTE Blade V40

What Galaxy A34 does better (16) and where Blade V40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy A34
Samsung · 2023Galaxy A34
7.5Score
16 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
vs
ZTE Blade V40
ZTE · 2023Blade V40
6.4Score
2 advantages
7.5Display4.6
7.7Camera3.9
5.3Battery7.4
7.7Features6.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A34Blade V40
78.1 × 161.38.277.4 × 165.79.7
Galaxy A34Blade V40Difference
Height161.3 mm165.7 mm−4.4 mm
Width78.1 mm77.4 mm+0.7 mm
Thickness8.2 mm9.7 mm−1.5 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A34 better than Blade V40?

  1. Refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×
  2. OLED panelYes · Blade V40: No
  3. Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
  4. Optical stabilisationYes · Blade V40: No
  5. Stereo speakersYes · Blade V40: No
  6. RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
  7. Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
  8. Rear cameras2 vs 12×
  9. Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V40: No
  10. Max video4K vs 1080p
  11. 4K selfie videoYes · Blade V40: No
  12. CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+18%

Why is Blade V40 better than Galaxy A34?

  1. Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 6,000 mAh+20%
  2. 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A34: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Design
Weight199 g—
Thickness8.2 mm9.7 mm
Height161.3 mm165.7 mm
Width78.1 mm77.4 mm
FramePlastic—
BackPlastic—
Ingress protectionIP67—
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7—
Glass protectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5—
ColoursLime, Graphite, Violet, SilverBlack, Blue
Display
Screen size6.6″6.7″
PanelSuper AMOLEDIPS LCD
OLED panelYesNo
Resolution (width)1,080 px1,080 px
Resolution (height)2,340 px2,400 px
Pixel density390 ppi395 ppi
Refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Peak brightness1,000 nits—
Measured brightness1,009 nits—
Screen-to-body ratio84.9%83.7%
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 1080Mediatek Dimensity 700
Chip makerMediaTekMediaTek
Process6 nm7 nm
CPU cores88
CPU frequency2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
GPUMali-G68 MC4Mali-G57 MC2
AnTuTu score472,126—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,316—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme639—
Memory
RAM8 GB6 GB
Storage (max)256 GB128 GB
Storage (base)128 GB128 GB
Storage typeUFS 2.2—
Memory card slotYesYes
Camera
Main camera48 MP48 MP
Main camera aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Main sensor size1/2.0"—
Rear cameras21
Optical stabilisationYesNo
Ultra-wide cameraYesNo
Telephoto cameraNoNo
Max video4K1080p
4K video frame rate30 fps—
Selfie camera13 MP8 MP
4K selfie videoYesNo
Battery
Battery capacity5,000 mAh6,000 mAh
Battery typeLi-IonLi-Po
Wired charging25 W22 W
Charged in 30 min49%—
Wireless chargingNoNo
Connectivity
5GYesYes
eSIMNoNo
Dual SIMYesYes
Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 4
Bluetooth5.3—
NFCYesYes
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0
USB version22
Satellite navigationGLONASS, GALILEO, BDS—
Features
Stereo speakersYesNo
3.5 mm headphone jackNoYes
Loudspeaker loudness-26.1 LUFS—
Fingerprint sensorUnder displaySide
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity
SAR (head)0.55 W/kg—
Software
OS at launchAndroid 13Android 12
PlatformAndroidAndroid
InterfaceOne UI 8.5MyOS 11
Major OS updates promised4—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare