- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A34 vs Y200
Samsung Galaxy A34 vs Vivo Y200
What Galaxy A34 does better (13) and where Y200 wins (7) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.5
7.7Camera6.1
5.3Battery5.1
7.7Features4.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A34Y200
| Galaxy A34 | Y200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 161.3 mm | 162.4 mm | −1.1 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 74.9 mm | +3.2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm | +0.5 mm |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | +9 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A34 better than Y200?
- Optical stabilisationYes · Y200: No
- NFCYes · Y200: No
- Stereo speakersYes · Y200: No
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 4,800 mAh+4%
- CPU frequency2.6 GHz vs 2 GHz+30%
- Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 800 nits+25%
- Memory card slotYes · Y200: No
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Y200: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- 4K selfie videoYes · Y200: No
Why is Y200 better than Galaxy A34?
- Wired charging25 W vs 44 W+76%
- Main camera48 MP vs 64 MP+33%
- Weight199 g vs 190 g+5%
- Charged in 30 min49% vs 80%+63%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Thickness8.2 mm vs 7.7 mm+6%
- Screen-to-body ratio84.9% vs 88.3%+4%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 161.3 mm | 162.4 mm |
| Width | 78.1 mm | 74.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Plastic | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Purple, Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.6″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 390 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,000 nits | 800 nits |
| Measured brightness | 1,009 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.9% | 88.3% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | Qualcomm |
| Process | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| AnTuTu score | 472,126 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,316 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 639 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 64 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | Yes | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 4,800 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 44 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 49% | 80% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | Yes | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.55 W/kg | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 13 | Android 13 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | Funtouch 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | — |
