- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A33 vs Redmi Note 12 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A33 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
What Galaxy A33 does better (6) and where Redmi Note 12 Pro wins (10) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.2Display7.5
7.7Camera8.1
5.3Battery5.5
7.4Features5.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A33Redmi Note 12 Pro
| Galaxy A33 | Redmi Note 12 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 159.7 mm | 163 mm | −3.3 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Weight | 186 g | 187 g | −1 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A33 better than Redmi Note 12 Pro?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx32.3×
- Major OS updates promised4 vs 22×
- Memory card slotYes · Redmi Note 12 Pro: No
- Rear cameras4 vs 22×
- Pixel density412 ppi vs 395 ppi+4%
- Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.9+6%
Why is Redmi Note 12 Pro better than Galaxy A33?
- Wired charging25 W vs 67 W2.7×
- RAM6 GB vs 12 GB2×
- Storage (max)128 GB vs 256 GB2×
- Refresh rate90 Hz vs 120 Hz+33%
- Main camera48 MP vs 50 MP+4%
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A33: Yes
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.6 GHz+8%
- Screen size6.4″ vs 6.7″+4%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
- Wi-Fi standardWi-Fi 5 vs Wi-Fi 6+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 186 g | 187 g |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm | 8 mm |
| Height | 159.7 mm | 163 mm |
| Width | 74 mm | 76 mm |
| Frame | — | Plastic |
| Back | — | Glass |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP53 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx3 |
| Glass protection | Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Colours | — | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.4″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,400 px | 2,400 px |
| Pixel density | 412 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | — | 900 nits |
| Measured brightness | — | 890 nits |
| Screen-to-body ratio | — | 86.7% |
| HDR | — | Yes |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Samsung Exynos 1280 | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 |
| Chip maker | Samsung | MediaTek |
| Process | — | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| GPU | — | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| AnTuTu score | — | 490,526 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | — | 2,209 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 629 |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | — | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | No |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Main sensor size | — | 1/1.56" |
| Rear cameras | 4 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 4K |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | — | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Active use (test) | — | 12.1 h |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 67 W |
| Charged in 30 min | — | 100% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Infrared port | — | Yes |
| Satellite navigation | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | — | Yes |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | — | -26.6 LUFS |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | proximity, accelerometer, compass, fingerprint | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | — | 0.99 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 4.1 | MIUI 13 |
| Major OS updates promised | 4 | 2 |
