- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A32 5G vs Blade V30 Vita
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs ZTE Blade V30 Vita
What Galaxy A32 5G does better (10) and where Blade V30 Vita wins (5) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Display5.0
6.3Camera3.9
4.0Battery5.6
7.1Features3.5
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A32 5GBlade V30 Vita
| Galaxy A32 5G | Blade V30 Vita | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164.2 mm | 173 mm | −8.8 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 78.1 mm | −2 mm |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 205 g | 210 g | −5 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A32 5G better than Blade V30 Vita?
- RAM8 GB vs 3 GB2.7×
- 5GYes · Blade V30 Vita: No
- NFCYes · Blade V30 Vita: No
- CPU frequency2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz+25%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Blade V30 Vita: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- Weight205 g vs 210 g+2%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 8 MP+62%
- Bluetooth5 vs 4.2+19%
Why is Blade V30 Vita better than Galaxy A32 5G?
- Storage (base)64 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Pixel density270 ppi vs 288 ppi+7%
- Screen size6.5″ vs 6.8″+5%
- Screen-to-body ratio81.6% vs 102%+25%
- Thickness9.1 mm vs 8.9 mm+2%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 205 g | 210 g |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm | 8.9 mm |
| Height | 164.2 mm | 173 mm |
| Width | 76.1 mm | 78.1 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | — |
| Back | Plastic | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | — |
| Colours | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Blue, Awesome Violet | Black, Blue, Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.5″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | TFT LCD | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | No | No |
| Resolution (width) | 720 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 1,600 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 288 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 497 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 81.6% | 102% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 | — |
| Chip maker | MediaTek | — |
| Process | 7 nm | — |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | — |
| AnTuTu score | 226,561 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 1,673 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 362 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Storage (max) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 48 MP | 48 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.0" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | No | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Po |
| Wired charging | 15 W | — |
| Charged in 30 min | 23% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | No |
| eSIM | No | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5 | 4.2 |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | — |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -28.5 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| SAR (head) | 0.33 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 11 | Android 11 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 5 | — |
