- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A27 vs nubia A77
Samsung Galaxy A27 vs ZTE nubia A77
What Galaxy A27 does better (16) and where nubia A77 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.2Display6.3
7.9Camera4.6
4.3Battery5.1
7.7Features6.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A27nubia A77
| Galaxy A27 | nubia A77 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 162.4 mm | 168 mm | −5.6 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 77 mm | +1.2 mm |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm | −0.5 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 193 g | +7 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A27 better than nubia A77?
- OLED panelYes · nubia A77: No
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Optical stabilisationYes · nubia A77: No
- RAM8 GB vs 6 GB+33%
- Wired charging25 W vs 22 W+11%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 265 ppi+45%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · nubia A77: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · nubia A77: No
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz+9%
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is nubia A77 better than Galaxy A27?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A27: Yes
- Weight200 g vs 193 g+4%
- Bluetooth5.1 vs 5.4+6%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 193 g |
| Thickness | 7.8 mm | 8.3 mm |
| Height | 162.4 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 78.2 mm | 77 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP64 | IP64 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black, Blue, Light Green, Light Pink | Obsidian Black, Glacier White, Twilight Purple |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,640 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 265 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,400 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.8% | 83.6% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Unisoc T8300 |
| Chip maker | Qualcomm | Unisoc |
| Process | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 694,659 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,973 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 911 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 3.1 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 12 MP | 8 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 12.7 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 22 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 45% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -26.4 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.78 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 9 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | A | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 51 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
