- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A26 vs Note 100 4G
Samsung Galaxy A26 vs Umidigi Note 100 4G
What Galaxy A26 does better (11) and where Note 100 4G wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display6.4
8.0Camera5.5
3.2Battery5.0
8.4Features6.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A26Note 100 4G
| Galaxy A26 | Note 100 4G | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 167.8 mm | −3.8 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.4 mm | +0.1 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.7 mm | = |
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g | +10 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A26 better than Note 100 4G?
- OLED panelYes · Note 100 4G: No
- Optical stabilisationYes · Note 100 4G: No
- Wired charging25 W vs 20 W+25%
- Pixel density385 ppi vs 258 ppi+49%
- Process5 nm vs 12 nm2.4×
- CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 1.8 GHz+33%
- Rear cameras2 vs 12×
- Ultra-wide cameraYes · Note 100 4G: No
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Note 100 4G: No
- Resolution (width)1,080 px vs 720 px+50%
Why is Note 100 4G better than Galaxy A26?
- 3.5 mm headphone jackNo · Galaxy A26: Yes
- Weight200 g vs 190 g+5%
- Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 190 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.7 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 167.8 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | — |
| Colours | Black, White, Mint, Peach Pink | Rock Black, Interstellar Blue, Starry White |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.8″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| OLED panel | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 720 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 1,600 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 258 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | — |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 - Global | Unisoc T615 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Unisoc |
| Process | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 - Global Mali-G68 - LATAM | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,811 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,768 | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 794 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | — |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | — |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | — |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 1 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | No |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | No |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 16 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Active use (test) | 10.7 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 20 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 51% | — |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | — |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | — |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | — |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | — |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | — |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 37 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
