- android.gs
- Compare
- Galaxy A26 vs Galaxy F17
Samsung Galaxy A26 vs Samsung Galaxy F17
What Galaxy A26 does better (7) and where Galaxy F17 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.5Display7.3
5.2Performance5.0
8.0Camera7.8
3.2Battery5.3
8.4Features6.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
Galaxy A26Galaxy F17
| Galaxy A26 | Galaxy F17 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 164 mm | 164.4 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm | −0.4 mm |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm | +0.2 mm |
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g | +8 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Galaxy A26 better than Galaxy F17?
- Storage (max)256 GB vs 128 GB2×
- Refresh rate120 Hz vs 90 Hz+33%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Geekbench 6 (multi-core)2,768 vs 2,242+23%
- Max video4K vs 1080p
- eSIMYes · Galaxy F17: No
- Charged in 30 min51% vs 47%+9%
Why is Galaxy F17 better than Galaxy A26?
- Peak brightness800 nits vs 1,100 nits+38%
- Weight200 g vs 192 g+4%
- Thickness7.7 mm vs 7.5 mm+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design | ||
| Weight | 200 g | 192 g |
| Thickness | 7.7 mm | 7.5 mm |
| Height | 164 mm | 164.4 mm |
| Width | 77.5 mm | 77.9 mm |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Back | Glass | Plastic |
| Ingress protection | IP67 | IP54 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Glass protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Colours | Black, White, Mint, Peach Pink | Black, Violet |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.7″ | 6.7″ |
| Panel | Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| OLED panel | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 1,080 px | 1,080 px |
| Resolution (height) | 2,340 px | 2,340 px |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 385 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 800 nits | 1,100 nits |
| Measured brightness | 777 nits | — |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.7% | 86% |
| Performance | ||
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 - Global | Exynos 1330 |
| Chip maker | Exynos | Exynos |
| Process | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| CPU cores | 8 | 8 |
| CPU frequency | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 - Global Mali-G68 - LATAM | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| AnTuTu score | 579,811 | 571,738 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi-core) | 2,768 | 2,242 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 794 | — |
| Memory | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage (max) | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage (base) | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory card slot | Yes | Yes |
| Camera | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Main camera aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Main sensor size | 1/2.76" | 1/2.76" |
| Rear cameras | 2 | 2 |
| Optical stabilisation | Yes | Yes |
| Ultra-wide camera | Yes | Yes |
| Telephoto camera | No | No |
| Max video | 4K | 1080p |
| 4K video frame rate | 30 fps | — |
| Selfie camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| 4K selfie video | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 5,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | Li-Ion |
| Active use (test) | 10.7 h | — |
| Wired charging | 25 W | 25 W |
| Charged in 30 min | 51% | 47% |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| 5G | Yes | Yes |
| eSIM | Yes | No |
| Dual SIM | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi standard | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| Satellite navigation | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Features | ||
| Stereo speakers | No | No |
| 3.5 mm headphone jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker loudness | -27.1 LUFS | — |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| SAR (head) | 0.41 W/kg | 0.64 W/kg |
| Software | ||
| OS at launch | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| Platform | Android | Android |
| Interface | One UI 8.5 | One UI 8.5 |
| Major OS updates promised | 6 | 6 |
| EU label | ||
| Energy class | C | — |
| Battery charge cycles | 1,200 | — |
| Endurance per cycle | 37 h | — |
| Repairability class | C | — |
| Drop resistance class | B | — |
