android.gs
Compare
Galaxy A25 vs Redmi Note 14 5G (China)

Samsung Galaxy A25 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)

What Galaxy A25 does better (4) and where Redmi Note 14 5G (China) wins (11) — every spec side by side.

Samsung · 2023Galaxy A25

7.2Score

4 advantages≈ $155

Xiaomi · 2024Redmi Note 14 5G (China)

8.2Score

11 advantages≈ $150

Higher score

7.5Display8.3

8.0Camera7.3

3.1Battery7.7

8.0Features6.8

Dimensions

Size comparison

Galaxy A25Redmi Note 14 5G (China)

	Galaxy A25	Redmi Note 14 5G (China)	Difference
Height	161 mm	162.4 mm	−1.4 mm
Width	76.5 mm	75.7 mm	+0.8 mm
Thickness	8.3 mm	8 mm	+0.3 mm
Weight	197 g	190 g	+7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Galaxy A25 better than Redmi Note 14 5G (China)?

Rear cameras2 vs 12×
Ultra-wide cameraYes · Redmi Note 14 5G (China): No
Max video4K vs 1080p
Process5 nm vs 6 nm+20%

Why is Redmi Note 14 5G (China) better than Galaxy A25?

Wired charging25 W vs 45 W+80%
Peak brightness1,000 nits vs 2,100 nits2.1×
RAM8 GB vs 12 GB+50%
Battery capacity5,000 mAh vs 5,110 mAh+2%
CPU frequency2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz+4%
Weight197 g vs 190 g+4%
Screen size6.5″ vs 6.7″+3%
Selfie camera13 MP vs 16 MP+23%
Main camera aperturef/1.8 vs f/1.5+20%
Screen-to-body ratio84.2% vs 87.4%+4%
Thickness8.3 mm vs 8 mm+4%

Specifications

Side by side

Only differences	Samsung Galaxy A25≈ $1557.2	Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (China)≈ $1508.2
Design
Weight	197 g	190 g
Thickness	8.3 mm	8 mm
Height	161 mm	162.4 mm
Width	76.5 mm	75.7 mm
Frame	Plastic	—
Back	Plastic	—
Ingress protection	—	IP64
Water resistance (IPx)	—	IPx4
Glass protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Colours	Brave Black, Personality Yellow, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue	Black, White, Green
Display
Screen size	6.5″	6.7″
Panel	Super AMOLED	OLED
OLED panel	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	1,080 px	1,080 px
Resolution (height)	2,340 px	2,400 px
Pixel density	396 ppi	395 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Peak brightness	1,000 nits	2,100 nits
Measured brightness	1,030 nits	—
Screen-to-body ratio	84.2%	87.4%
HDR	—	Yes
Performance
Chipset	Exynos 1280	Mediatek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
Chip maker	Exynos	MediaTek
Process	5 nm	6 nm
CPU cores	8	8
CPU frequency	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz
GPU	Mali-G68	IMG BXM-8-256
AnTuTu score	443,234	—
Geekbench 6 (multi-core)	2,023	—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme	643	—
Memory
RAM	8 GB	12 GB
Storage (max)	256 GB	256 GB
Storage (base)	128 GB	128 GB
Storage type	UFS 2.2	UFS 2.2
Memory card slot	Yes	Yes
Camera
Main camera	50 MP	50 MP
Main camera aperture	f/1.8	f/1.5
Main sensor size	1/2.76"	1/1.96"
Rear cameras	2	1
Optical stabilisation	Yes	Yes
Ultra-wide camera	Yes	No
Telephoto camera	No	No
Max video	4K	1080p
4K video frame rate	30 fps	—
Selfie camera	13 MP	16 MP
4K selfie video	No	No
Battery
Battery capacity	5,000 mAh	5,110 mAh
Battery type	Li-Ion	—
Active use (test)	10.3 h	—
Wired charging	25 W	45 W
Charged in 30 min	49%	—
Wireless charging	No	No
Connectivity
5G	Yes	Yes
eSIM	No	No
Dual SIM	Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi standard	Wi-Fi 5	Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
NFC	Yes	Yes
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
USB version	2	2
Satellite navigation	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Features
Stereo speakers	Yes	Yes
3.5 mm headphone jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker loudness	-26 LUFS	—
Fingerprint sensor	Side	Side
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass
SAR (head)	0.46 W/kg	—
Software
OS at launch	Android 14	Android 14
Platform	Android	Android
Interface	One UI 8.5	HyperOS
Major OS updates promised	4	—